RENAL, PELVIC AND MESENTERIC TUMORS WITH LOW SIGNAL INTENSITY ON T2-WEIGHTED MR IMAGE: A REVIEW

Mohammad Abdullah Dhulaimi, Moroj Ahmad Aldarmasi

Abstract


The magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of intra-abdominal tumors is necessary for clinical practice. MR imaging involves the optimal evaluation of masses due to its inherent soft tissue contrast and multiplanar scanning abilities. T2 low-signal tumors are not common, and individuals need to be careful when interpreting them.

The tumors that contain smooth muscle components, a high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio, or papillary architecture, among other components, tend to display low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. MR imaging allows for both the detection and characterization of tumors. , especially when they have low signal intensity when presented on T2-weighted images. As a result, it becomes essential to identify the various characteristics that define each tumor.

Identification of the tumor spectrum and knowing the cause of low signal intensity on T2 –weighted images helps the radiologist to narrow the differential diagnosis and reach a final diagnosis.


Keywords


Magnetic Resonance Imaging, diagnosis, Tumor, Low signal intensity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ho AA, Khara SS, Ferguson DJ, Mohammed MF, Chang SD, Harris AC. A PSA for radiologists: pictorial review of incidentalomas on prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70(2):134-46.

Braschi-Amirfarzan M, Keraliya AR, Krajewski KM, Tirumani SH, Shinagare AB, Hornick JL, et al. Role of imaging in management of desmoid-type fibromatosis: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics. 2016;36(3):767-82.

Vedanayagam M, Bhattacharya B, Sriprasad S. Magnetic resonance imaging and the use in small renal masses. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017;8(1):19-23.

Kim Y, Sung DJ, Sim KC, Han NY, Park BJ, Kim MJ, et al. Renal tumors with low signal intensities on T2-weighted MR image: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42(8):2108-18.

Sureka B, Khera PS. Radiologic classification and imaging features of renal angiomyolipomas according to the amount of fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(3):W136.

Herruela-Suffee C, Warin M, Castier-Amouyel M, Dallery F, Bonnaire B, Constans JM. Whole-body MRI in generalized cystic lymphangiomatosis in the pediatric population: diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and follow-up. Skeletal radiology. 2016;45(2):177-85.

Pedrosa I, Sun MR, Spencer M, Genega EM, Olumi AF, Dewolf WC, et al. MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with findings at surgery and pathologic analysis. Radiographics. 2008;28(4):985-1003.

Oliva MR, Glickman JN, Zou KH, Teo SY, Mortelé KJ, Rocha MS, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: t1 and t2 signal intensity characteristics of papillary and clear cell types correlated with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1524-30.

Lopes Vendrami C, Parada Villavicencio C, De Julio TJ, Chatterjee A, Casalino DD, Horowitz JM, et al. Differentiation of solid renal tumors with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiographics. 2017;37(7):2026-42.

Yen P, Khong K, Lamba R, Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO. Ovarian Fibromas and Fibrothecomas: Sonographic Correlation With Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A 5‐Year Single‐Institution Experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(1):13-8.

Hedgire SS, Kudrimoti S, Oliveira IS, Nadkarni N, McDermott S, Hahn PF, et al. Extranodal lymphomas of abdomen and pelvis: imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42(4):1096-112.

Beddy P, O'Neill AC, Yamamoto AK, Addley HC, Reinhold C, Sala E. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging. Radiographics. 2012;32(1):241-54.

Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG. Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):E251-E81.

Jung DC, Kim SH, Kim SH. MR imaging findings of ovarian cystadenofibroma and cystadenocarcinofibroma: clues for the differential diagnosis. Korean J Radiol. 2006;7(3):199-204.

Khashper A, Addley HC, Abourokbah N, Nougaret S, Sala E, Reinhold C. T2-hypointense adnexal lesions: an imaging algorithm. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1047-64.

Gangadhar K, Mahajan A, Sable N, Bhargava P, editors. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic masses: a compartmental approach. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI; 2017: Elsevier.

Claus FG, Hricak H, Hattery RR. Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer: role of MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiographics. 2004;24(suppl_1):S167-S80.

Buragina G, Magenta Biasina A, Carrafiello G. Clinical and radiological features of mesenteric panniculitis: a critical overview. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(4):411-22.

Fasih N, Prasad Shanbhogue AK, Macdonald DB, Fraser-Hill MA, Papadatos D, Kielar AZ, et al. Leiomyomas beyond the uterus: unusual locations, rare manifestations. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):1931-48.

Chung EM, Biko DM, Arzamendi AM, Meldrum JT, Stocker JT. Solid tumors of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery in children: radiologic-pathologic correlation: from the radiologic pathology archives. Radiographics. 2015;35(2):521-46.

Sinha A, Hansmann A, Bhandari S, Gupta A, Burling D, Rana S, et al. Imaging assessment of desmoid tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis: is state-of-the-art 1.5 T MRI better than 64-MDCT? Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1015):e254-e61.

Sharma P, Yadav S, Needham CM, Feuerstadt P. Sclerosing mesenteritis: a systematic review of 192 cases. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2017;10(2):103-11.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v15i3.460

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Mohammad Abdullah Dhulaimi, Moroj Ahmad Aldarmasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.