FACTORS AFFECTING ANAESTHESIA PREFERENCES OF THE GRAVID WOMEN WHO ARE TO DELIVER BY CAESAREAN SECTION

Helin Sahinturk, Sanem Turhan, Selvi Ozlem Can, Ali Abbas Ylmaz, Asuman Uysalel

Abstract


Objectives: In recent years, a significant increase has been observed in the prevalence of caesarean sections (CS). Although as in many other countries, CS rates in Turkey are higher than the targeted rate. This increase in the prevalence of CS also affects obstetric anaesthesia.

In this study, we investigate the choice of anaesthesia among pregnant women who are scheduled for CS, as well as general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia rates, the reasons for choosing general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia, and the factors that affect their choices.

Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions were applied to pregnant women applying for delivery by elective caesarean operation, between November 2011 to November 2012, in order to study the anaesthesia technique they prefer and the reason behind their preferences.

The questionnaire was applied to pregnant women during the visit, on the day before the operation or while they were waiting in the waiting room before the CS procedure.

Results: Our study revealed that age, gravida, previous type of delivery, previous anaesthesia experience, employment status, monthly income level, educational status, being given information about anaesthesia in advance, the source of information, and being diagnosed with panic disorder were all found to be influential in the decision of which type of anaesthesia to opt for.

Conclusion: We have found out that the reason why pregnant women who have higher educational status, who work and have high level of monthly-income prefer regional anaesthesia method more depends on the fact that they have more information on anaesthesia method, they have more common use of the internet and the information they obtain from the people around them is not prejudiced against regional anaesthesia method. We believe that as the education levels rise in the future and the patient population becomes more aware, which will direct them to do more research, their preference rates will change.


Keywords


Caesarean, Anaesthesia Preferences, Questionnaire Study

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO . World Health Statistics 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57.

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu web portal. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu 2016 Verileri, İstatistiklerle Çocuk, 2016. htpp://www.tuik.gov. tr

Lim G, Facco FL, Nathan N, Waters JH, Wong CA, Eltzchig HK. A review of the impact of obstetric anaesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Anesthesiology 2018; 129(1): 192-215.

de Vienne CM, Creveuil C, Dreyfus M. Does young maternal age increase the risk of adverse obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 ;147(2):151-6.

Fall CH, Sachdev HS, Osmond C, Restrepo-Mendez MC, Victora C, Martorell R et al. Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the offspring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration). Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(7):e366-77.

Kocamanoğlu IS, Sarıhasan B, Sener B, Tür A, Şahinoğlu H, Sunter T. Sezaryen uygulamalarında uygulanan anestezi yöntemleri ve komplikasyonları: 3552 olgunun retrospektiv değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J. Med. Sci 2005; 25(6):810-6.

Gülhaş N, Şanlı M, Özgül Ü, Bergeç Z, Durmuş M. Sezaryenlerde Anestezi Yönetimi: Retrospektif Değerlendirme. Journal of Inonu University Medical Faculty. 2012; 19(3):142-5.

Buyukbayrak EE, Kaymaz O, Kars B, Karsıdag KYA, Bektas E, Unal O et al. Caesarean delivery or vaginal birth: Preference of Turkish pregnant women and influencing factors. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30(2): 155-8.

Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, Qian P, Kristiansen SI. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(1):45e1-9.

Bukar M, Kwari YD, Moruppa YJ, Ndonya ND. Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: Choice of technique among antenatal attendees in North-eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30(8):822-5.

Yılmaz AA, Ateş Y. Ağrı Algılanmasında Kadın ve Erkek Farkları. Doktor Dergisi Haziran-Temmuz 2017;84-8.

Adams SS, Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: a study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery. BJOG 2012; 119(10):1238-46.

Klabbers GA, van Bakel HJA, van den Heuvel MMA, Vingerhoets AJ. Severe fear of childbirth: Its features, assesment, prevalence, determinants, consequences and possible treatments. Psychological Topics 2016; 25(1),:107-27.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v14i1.271

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.