THE EFFICIENCY OF SUCTION DRAIN USAGE IN ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY

Cuneyt Oncel, Mert Ozcan, Murat Erem, Cem Copuroglu, Mert Ciftdemir, Fatma Nesrin Turan

Abstract


Aim:The study was designed to investigate the efficiency of suction drain after arthroscopic knee surgery. It is hypothesized that suction drain decreases postoperative hemarthrosis after arthroscopic knee surgery.

Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups. Suction drain was used in Group I and no drain was used in Group II. The groups were compared in terms of rest and activity pain, range of motion, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, patellar shock, need for postoperative knee puncture, amount of drainage, time of hospitalization, and loss of labor. Arthroscopic interventions like meniscectomy, synovectomy, meniscus repair and microfracture were also compared for the amount of patellar shock, need for postoperative knee puncture and amount of drainage.

Results: The difference for activity pain and range of motion between the two groups was statistically nonsignificant. Rest pain improved faster in control group. Lysholm and IKDC scores were improved in both groups but the amount of increase was statistically nonsignificant. The amount of patellar shock was also statistically nonsignificant between the two groups. The amount of patellar shock, need for postoperative knee puncture and amount of drainage were also statistically nonsignifiant for arthroscopic interventions like meniscectomy and synovectomy.

Conclusions: Suction drain application was unnecessary in many situations after arthroscopic knee surgery in this study. Although suction drain usage delayed the recovery from postoperative pain in this study, other parameters of pain were not affected from suction drain usage. Routine usage of a suction drain after arthroscopic knee surgery was not recommended.


Keywords


Suction drain, knee arthroscopy, hemarthrosis, postoperative pain, patellar shock

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akan K, Ünay L, Berkem L, Güven M, Poyanl? O. Suction drainage influence on knee effusion following partial fat pad or synovium resection. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2001; 45(4): 221-4.

Coupens SD, Yates CK. The effect of tourniquet use and hemovac drainage on postoperative hemarthrosis. Arthroscopy.1991; 7(3): 278-82.

Tatari H, Dervi?bey M, Muratl? K, Ergör A. Report of experience in 190 patients with the use of closed suction drainage in arthroscopic knee procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13(6): 458-62.

Browett JP, Gibbs AN, Copeland SA, Deliss LJ. The use of suction drainage in the operation of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1978; 60-B(4): 516-9.

Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10(3): 150-4.

Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ,Harrast JJ. International Knee Documentation Committee. The International knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(1): 128-35.

Nett MP, Pedersen HB, Roehring GJ, Tria AJ, Scott WN. Clinical examination of the knee. In:Scott WN, ed. Surgery of the Knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2012; 47-60.

Clifton R, Haleem S, McKee A, Parker MJ. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systemic review of randomised controlled trials. Knee. 2007;14:348-51.

Johnson LL. Characteristics of the immediate postarthroscopic blood cloth formation in the knee joint. Arthroscopy.1991;7(1):14-23.

Kissin YD, Scott WN, Cushner FD. Arthroscopic meniscal resection. In:Scott WN, ed. Surgery of the Knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2012; 268-74.

Monchik K, Fadale P. Arthroscopic approaches to synovial pathology. In: Johnson DH, ed. Operative Arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2013; 923-31.

Sorenson RM, Pace NL. Anesthetic techniques during surgical repair of femoral neck fractures. A meta analysis. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77(6): 1095-104.

Hu S, Zhang ZY, Hua YQ, Li J, Cai ZD. A comparison of regional and general anesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee. A meta analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2009; 91(7): 935-42.

Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. A meta analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anesthes. 2000; 84(4): 450-5.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v13i3.262

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Cuneyt Oncel, Mert Ozcan, Murat Erem, Cem Copuroglu, Mert Ciftdemir, Fatma Nesrin Turan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.